I'm just some dude, not who you are looking for here!
If you care to peek into my MAL, take in mind the scores do not reflect the quality of the show but rather how fun the experience was for me and how my overall enjoyment was, a series I consider to be shit can be incredibly fun sometimes. I also do my best to NOT UPDATE SCORES, even on rewatch, I want them to be a timestamp of my state of mind when I originally finished a series.
If you want a more sane and updated score for a series I watched, lemme know....below, theres an attempt to make sense of my "logic" when scoring...
Score interpretation cheatsheet:
| Score | lameass justification |
| 10* | Liked it a lot and I wanted more of it, when I originally watched it! (NOT PERFECT) |
| 9* | I really liked it on my first watch. (NOT CLOSE TO PERFECT) |
| 8 | Good/Fun enough for me to finish (ENJOYED) |
| 7 | Barely decent enough to not drop, may not watch forward (ALMOST DIDNT ENJOY) |
| 6 | Meh, I didnt like that much (MEH) |
| <6 | that wasnt fun at all (rare, I usually drop these and dont add them) (FUCK THIS) |
Scores with an * are also heavily influenced by niche shit I may like that may inflate a score...
or something I dislike so much that it goes around and it becomes funny, lol |
- Why are the scores so inflated?
I have an inflation fetish. When I started out I enjoyed eating shit and I since I made a vow to
not update scores, I decided to keep some level of consistency...this does limit my scoring potential, specially for bad series, but I dont care. If a series is TOO bad that I would rate it much lower than 7, I usually just drop it and dont even add it to my list.
- Why so many degen shit above 8?
It varies, sometimes because it's funny, sometimes because I feel it has other redeeming qualities and, in other cases, I may just like said degen shit specifically, so if you wanna know, ask me about the series specifically and I'll tell ya!
- How can X have the same score as Y?! Are you crazy?
I am, but thats besides the point...discrepancies usually have to do with my compromise to not update scores, older series had higher scores because I used to watch shit exclusively at one point so my taste was """"less refined"""". BUT, even disregarding that, I just dont care about this at all, check my score cheatsheet above, I only rate based on enjoyment and enjoyment varies on my expectations...a series that seems like shit to me but isnt, will be inflated harder than a series everyone hyped me about and lived up to said hype.
tl;dr: My list is made as a way to track my enjoyment and not to meassure quality, think of it like peeking into my diary, lol.
Note: I use tags for faster lookup when I forget the name of a series, those are full of spoilers and cringy shit I wrote 15 years ago, so enter my MAL with discretion (blame MAL for not having a way to have a column private)
All Comments (42) Comments
I already put it on my list with high priority (*asterisk in tags). But yeah, thanks for the rec. I'm probably going to watch it sooner now.
The Zero no Tsukaima franchise was what made you like anime? That's interesting. I can see why though, every single episode has been enjoyable for me. I'll be sad when it's all over :<
Even more, you're still on MAL!
Can I get a high-five?
we'll definitely see, that's for sure
at any rate,Im happy you enjoyed watching the series :)
im the same,i dont like long animes,however,death note is a must-watch,so I made an exception.
just curious.
Yeah, of course it's a bug. As seen in that thread (which I found out by googling "my list views" to see if there was a bug report/explanation), the forum moderator said:
It is indeed a problem with search engine robots crawling the tag links on your list. This is how search engines index the websites you search for everyday -- by following every link to every place as much as they can. The tag links are passed via GET in the address bar and so the search engines view your list as many different lists, with each one needing to be indexed.
This effect is multiplied by the different combinations of sorts (ascending and descending and default) for each column in your list, and then for each status in addition to the main combined list, etc. Hence it scans your list an extra time for each tag, and for each combination of ascending/descending/unsorted for each column with each of those tags, and for each status filter.
If you have taken any statistics courses, you'll probably understand how quickly permutations can grow. Hundreds of thousands of hits by a web crawler (or two or three) is certainly plausible. They also tend to visit multiple times to check if your list has updated. This stat explosion has cropped up before and that was the cause then, too.
It's not necessarily unfixable -- There are ways to tell the robots not to follow certain links (like the column sort heading links), which would save MAL some bandwidth and avoid this kind of confusion.
And I find this plausible. Must be that you have so much tags, google and other internet bots scan your list, and give alot of page views...
But it's pretty weird. You end up with thousands of views, totally illegitimate lol.
I removed the tag column from my list as well, and couldn't care about tags anyway =)