Report Ionliosite2's Profile

The funny thing is that they'd have to bring axes, which are fine for combat as well. Despite how well-made Viking swords were, I believe axes were more commonly used by them. Ivar guy smart, Thorfinn dumb. :3

"I have no enemies," is all that I got. So did they really not bring swords? :D

Props for getting through Apothecary Diaries again, it's rough having to stand 24 more episodes of Chinese She-Hulk slop. Cool to see you got better from that sickness!

Your review of apothecary diaries is great, especially the part about the cop outs, that pissed me off a lot and i don't even like this show

I can't help but notice that you started Panty & Stocking with Garterbelt. I don't know if it is your type of show but I'm happy that you're giving it a try, it's an interesting experience lol

"Their movement is less limited than humans. To us, they look like they're standing still because they operate on a timescale so different from ours. Rocks move on a scale of thousands and millions of years." The rocks in Ruri no Houseki have more personality, characterization, and character development than Frieren ever had. 🥹

4.62

wanna be friends?

Oh, lol, took me a minute to figure out what that was in reference to. :P

You're right, this discussion is pointless. You're confusing subjectivity (personal interpretation) with bias (prejudice or slanted thinking). They’re not the same. You're not actually debating, you're deflecting, misrepresenting, and trying to ego-flex because your own take fell apart. It’s obvious now that you weren’t arguing with any intention to understand or discuss, just to be “right.” I'm not gonna refute every single one of your nitpicky claptrap points like I've been generous enough to do before. I’ll let your comments speak for themselves.

Just throwing this out there:
objectivity: the fact of being based on facts and not influenced by personal beliefs or feelings
Source: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/objectivity

Hi Ionliosite2. Don't mind me, I just figured I'd leave this here since the dude you're going back and forth with seems completely unable (or, let's be honest, unwilling) to fully internalize the concept:

Bi·as - verb: 1. cause to feel or show inclination or prejudice for or against someone or something.

Like you, I hope that they can eventually come to recognize the difference between analysis and a plot synopsis. Though odds are that they'll just continue to incoherently attack anybody whose opinion doesn't perfectly align with their own.

The "baby swap" arc in Apothecary Diaries isn’t far‑fetched, it’s grounded in established palace politics and subtle but logical clues that Maomao pieces together. Her deduction isn’t about magic or Mary-Sue luck, it’s solid detective work using in-universe knowledge and narrative consistency. And her knowing metallurgy is not weird at all. She's literally the adoptive daughter of a doctor and physician and was raised around medicine, toxins, and alchemical practices. Knowing the effects of metals isn’t supergenius-tier knowledge in that context; it’s just practical, real-world application within her field. That’s literally part of the realism Apothecary Diaries leans into. If that’s what tipped the scale for you into Mary Sue territory, then yeah, you're either trolling or just willfully ignoring the show to protect your baseless hating. And honestly, my comment about the writing still stands since you seem to have a problem with the show as a whole, including the narrative. Otherwise you wouldn't have scored it so low haha.

And my statement is not an ad hominem lol. I did not make a personal attack in any way. I'm simply pointing out hypocritical inconsistencies in your judgement, and I could go on and on, such as you shitting on Eminence in Shadow, Solo Leveling, and simultaneously appreciating SAO while they are all just as crappy; inane power fantasies that you seem to dislike so much. This just reinforces my point that you live and breathe bias, which is really anti-intellectual.




Alright, buddy. I get that bias is your entire rating criteria, but this is the most immature, braindead take I've seen in a while. Although we all have some level of bias (with yours being on another level), I do believe that a functional human being can speak with objectivity. Yeah, objectivity. Start by learning what that is before bringing up terms like ad hominem lol.

Maomao is undeniably very smart, but she's far from perfect. She reacts emotionally, sometimes cracks under pressure, gets frustrated when she can't figure something out, and she needs all the necessary clues to reach her conclusions. And let's be honest, some cases were pretty damn obvious even if you weren't paying much attention... Besides, having practical knowledge of the world she lives in doesn’t make her "overpowered". That’s just called being competent within her setting. You don’t need to feel bad for not knowing it yourself; you’re not living in 16th-century China, after all lol. She’s not a Mary Sue, she’s genuinely well-written. The narrative is subtle, intentionally understated, and respects the audience's ability to read between the lines. There’s nothing wrong with storytelling that doesn’t spoon-feed everything.

Comparing that to a power fantasy while simultaneously praising things like Black Clover and Bahamut Chronicle (of all things) is kind of wild. If you weren’t so biased, maybe your reviews wouldn’t read like thinly veiled prejudice half the time.

lol, the unicorn bit. It feels like spam since you singled out Unicorn in your review. :D