|
Generally speaking, I am on this site for the express purpose of archiving all I have personally seen. I am a philosopher and narrative analyst, as well as critical reviewer, all of my opinions are based on my own interpretations and understanding of a given work's philosophical, narrative, metanarrative and societal worth.
Any review I make, I make only for the purpose of documenting my feelings and issues with the given work. Reading negative reviews on this website often feels like an exercise in futility, as it will oftentimes be people with zero experience or understanding of storytelling, aesthetics or metanarrative elements attempting to dissect why they did not comprehend something. I endeavor to at least go against the grain in this regard.
If you are on my page with the intent of expressing disdain for my opinion on something I have reviewed, you are free to do so and I encourage you, it is usually extremely amusing.
|
All Comments (9) Comments
Radio technology was a crucial part of WW II, while in this story, radio is only starting to pick up by the events of the second movie, already far removed from when the war was actually fought. The fashion and dress are overall more akin to earlier Victorian-esque styles, but in particular, Benedict's adoption of high heels and a provocative shirt are very much reminiscent of the cultural exploration which occurred during the roaring twenties (post WW I, not II). The battle scenes are rather abstracted and don't tell us very much, but we didn't see any scenes associated with WW II (focus on air and mechanised power), instead seeing a few instances of massed artillery barrages, biplanes, etc., more commonly employed during WW I.
Anyway, your review was certainly interesting, even if I didn't agree with much of it. I hope you'll continue writing more reviews :)